Everyone I know who likes British costume dramas seemed
either beyond excited for this production or had seen it and thought it was as
beautiful as it was haunting. Because such accolades came from people whose
opinions I may not always agree with but do trust I was really excited to get
my hands on this. I had seen two versions prior to this and although I much
preferred the newer Masterpiece adaptation of the two, neither one gripped me
in the way that so many Dickens productions have. That is primarily the reason
I was so anxious to get my hands on this version.
Young Pip only has one protector. Orphaned, the boy lives
with his stern sister but her kind-hearted blacksmith husband, Joe (Shaun
Dooley) has always been Pip’s hero. Following an odd encounter with an escaped
convict named Magwitch (Ray Winstone) on a cold Christmas day, Pip’s whole world
is about to change. Everything he thought he wanted is now nothing but a past. The
recluse and mysterious Miss Havisham wishes for a young boy to come once a week
as a kind of playmate to her young impetuous adopted daughter. The locals are
still intrigued by the wealthy matron whose past has caused her to lock herself
away in a dilapidated old estate. Choosing to go, Pip is swept into the strange
woman’s world. Miss Havisham (Gillian Anderson) is a woman still used to
getting what she wants – her home is shrouded in more than dust and shadows as
she walks around bare-footed in a ratty old wedding gown. It is young Estella
that Pip quickly loses his young heart to. The teenage beauty is nearly as cold
as her mother but the naïve Pip is drawn into their world to the point of
wanting to live it. Assuming Miss Havisham wants to settle money on Pip, his
sister couldn’t be more thrilled but much to Pip’s disappoint after weeks that
turned into months of weekly visits, instead the woman pays for his apprenticeship
to train in the trade of balcksmith effectively putting an end to his visits
with Estella.
Years pass and Pip (Douglas Booth) grows into a fine-looking
man with little potential to become a gentleman. Out of nowhere, a well-known
London attorney named Jaggers (David Suchet) informs Pip that a mysterious
benefactor has settled a large fortune on him. There are stipulations: Including
never inquiring who his benefactor is until he reaches his majority but Pip
immediately assumes it is Miss Havisham. Being a man now with prospects, Pip leaves
for London but is still ensnared in her web – he is pulled back to the house
and into the dark secrets surrounding it when Estella (Vanessa Kirby) returns
from finishing school in Paris needing an escort… leading Pip to again pine for Estella.
It is hard to know where to begin in a production such as
this. The opening frame – and beyond of this mini-series is pure brilliance. It
puts every single one of our senses alert. The filming and set creates a
dangerous, mysterious scene only intensified set on the dark, dank marsh land
with characters whose purpose and intent we do not yet understand. Naturally if
one is privy to the book, everyone is not just familiar with the players but
who they will become – for me that did not lessen the intrigue even being familiar
with the story via film adaptations. The direction and acting were still beyond
compare. If you are unfamiliar with the plot, much of this will seem a tad… um…
perhaps, crazy but the strange thing about Dickens is that his novels are so
complex and mysterious but each always have points, meanings to every
motivation. He was truly a brilliant author.
Having seen two prior versions to this one, this is – by
far, the best of the lot. Although I’ve not read the novel (am I the only one
who finds the language… difficult?), a 3-hour miniseries is probably cutting a
lot of corners but it felt “complete” and authentic to its purpose. Pacing
comes across as a bit “off” or rushed a time or two but then cramming a lengthy,
droning novel into a time slot cannot be an easy feat. For that, scripter’s
deserve slack. One thing production did not skimp on was casting. The acting is
brilliant in this movie – particularly from Gillian Anderson. She owns the role
of Miss Havisham. The character is a ghostly shell of a woman whose disappointment
has been allowed to rule her life – it has manifested into misery at the least
and suicidal tendencies at the worse. Her fragile passive-aggressive attitude
is a prison of her own making, instead of moving on and “being happy” as Pip
once tells her she could have been. Her portrayal of the woman is not likely to
be beat in the near future – not even the talented Helena Bonham-Carter will be
likely surpass her interpretation. Sometimes, when there is one domineering
performance, everyone else pales in comparison, that is fortunately not the
case here. Everyone holds their own including newcomers Booth and Kirby. He is naïve
and conceited to be a strong version of Pip while Kirby is appropriately
alluring and cold in a two-dimensional act. Each of the performances is
unforgettable in their own right.
It is hard to “like” any Dickens-esque story because of its
themes, and this is not different. It shows how deeply flawed human nature can
be – at its worst. It reflects on the sorrows, regrets and tragedies that make
life… life. It re-counts the choices
that lead to despair and ruin, and leads us to believe that no one is going to
be happy because of the choices they have made. Despite having something to
live for, Miss Havisham turns her back not just on life but a young girl who
could have used love and the affection of a mother instead of the training to
become a woman who would grow up to hate men, and consequently be nearly as
miserable as the woman who raised her. Despite this being my favorite
adaptation of this story, it’s not my favorite Dickens film. Anyone who has
experienced his works knows each are merely quirky at best but innately
depressing and sometimes pure evil lives within the story. Dickens seems in a
class that was all his own. Paid by the word, the author wrote characters that strangely
nearly always resembled their surnames and were always “weird” but curiously
loveable – even if his villains were strictly nasty. This production does not have the same “bite”
as prior movies. There aren’t the usual troubling shivers Dickens can sometimes
cause and fortunately, for the audience, despite its ending still being
ambiguous, and slightly seeming to have been cut short, it will make romantics
sigh with pleasure. Not to mention, the costuming is gorgeous and even in some instances,
breathtaking. That alone gives this film "five stars."
Whatever you think of him or his style, know this: Great Expectations, whether changed from
the novel or not is distinctively Dickens. Make no mistake.
(What to know: The film would probably deserve a “soft” PG13-raing. Men are depicted as having
been beaten with blood everywhere [twice], two others are strangled [one does
die], and another is stabbed. One scene takes place at a “club” in which men
can pick out a “lady of the evening” for a price [nothing graphic]; Pip is
mocked for being a virgin. There are some tense moments and a woman is nearly
murdered [off-screen]. Implications inform that a woman is beaten in her
marriage as there are bruises as evidence and another woman commits suicide by
lighting herself on fire.)




+Image+Still3.jpg)






























Great review, I'm glad to hear that this adaptation of the novel was enjoyable! I've been hesitant to check it out as I didn't really enjoy the novel (I guess I will re-read it at some point, just not anytime soon). Will try to check this out at some point =)
ReplyDeleteAwesome review Rissi! Having read the book, I thought they did a great job with this adaptation for it, especially in regards to the whole flow and timing of it. Having said that though, this isn't one of my favorite Dickens story though... movie or book. And I agree, Anderson was "brilliant" as Miss Havisham.
ReplyDeleteI'm so glad you liked it! I thought it was brilliant. Yes, it left out some characters from the book, and no, it wasn't perfect -- but it engaged my emotions much more than previous adaptations of this particular story, in part thanks to Gillian's exquisitely haunting performance. I LOVE HER in this part. She's so gorgeous and twisted and utterly pathetic that you can't hate her, no matter how much she may deserve it.
ReplyDeleteMaybe it won't beat out Bleak House in my "Favorite Dickens Adaptation" list, but it comes darn close.
Lianne - thanks! So was I. It was really exciting to finally see this version, and it is definitely the most memorable. Because of the cast, I still have a "special" place for the 90's Masterpiece adaptation but... yeah, there is no denying this is the best. (Estella was still so darn "cold" at the end by Justine Waddell's portrayal.)
ReplyDeleteHope you enjoy it if / when you see this one, Li!
Natalie - thank you. (I like it when the movie makes it easy for me to organize these thoughts into a review - those are always best. =D)
Really? That is great to know. Some people didn't think this was all that faithful to the book but then... I wouldn't have an opinion either way. It is just the best of the three I've now seen. Yeah, it isn't my favorite story by Dickens either but it is still good. Totally Dickens!
Gillian Anderson was just grand! This is one of her best performances - ever.
Charity - me, too! I had so anticipated seeing it. A second viewing will probably make it even more brilliant.
Anderson was just one of the things that "made" this series - she was unforgettable. Truly memorable.
I still think Bleak House is my favorite Dickens film. So far...
I have been wanting to see this very badly-- my family and I are sort of Dickensphiles, haha. =) We can't wait to dig into this. We saw just a hint of it on TV the other day and Gillian Anderson was unrecognizable! I really enjoyed her in "Bleak House" and "Great Expectations" is a favorite Dickens, so there is much anticipation here. =)
ReplyDeleteThanks for the review; it only made me more excited!
I've never read this book either so you are not alone! This was actually my first time seeing a film/tv adaptation and I have to agree that it was very good. I loved Gillian but she's always amazing and Estella was gorgeous and I've never seen or heard of the actress who played her so it was nice to see a fresh face along with Booth. This was definitely one of the better Masterpiece productions IMO.
ReplyDeleteNice review as always!
XOXO~ Renee C.
AnnaKate - me, too! I was really anxious to see this one, and wound up having to wait a week after getting the DVD in the mail because my family was too busy and had other movies to watch first when it arrived! Now, I've finally seen it, it was worth the wait. =)
ReplyDeleteBleak House is awesome - I just love it. I think the two very different roles shows what a phenomenal actress Gillian truly is.
Enjoy!
Renee - yeah... there is just something about these classics (the books) that gets me every time I think I am going to actually get through one. (I did finally get through S&S but despite have started The Count of Monte Cristo, I've never gotten through it!)
Wasn't this memorable? A second viewing is going to make me like it all the more I think. It was mysterious and a look at human nature most of us probably don''t want to see. Just wonderful. Gillian is always amazing, and I liked seeing two new faces also. It will be fun to look out for them in other upcoming BBC dramas - or we can hope for it!
Thanks, Renee - I am really glad you shared your thoughts. =)
Very interesting review of this production! I've seen it around Christmas, when it was first broadcast at the BBC. I don't know yet whether I like this version or the 1999 version better. I probably should do a rewatch of both (but oh, so much to do, so little time). My hestitation might have something to do with the role of Pip being played by my beloved Ioan Gruffudd in the 1999 version ;-)
ReplyDeleteI absolutely don't think you're the only one who finds Dicken's language difficult. I do read one or two Dickens novels a year, but they take me quite long to finish and although I enjoy them, it's 'heavy' reading, so to say. I did enjoy Great Expectations, though David Copperfield is so far my favourite novel.
Dickens does indeed show very effectively how deeply flawed humans can be. I'm curious what you think of the new Edwin Drood adaptation if you've seen it. I think this aspect of Dickens was very strong in that adaptation.
Oh, I'm glad to see a review of this from you! I love Dickens works, and Great Expectations has recently become a favorite book of mine. It's such a wonderful book by a brilliant author (I agree!). I used to think the story of Great Expectations was downright queer and crazy, but as I read it again, I realized it had many great qualities.
ReplyDeleteAnd while I love the book, I haven't seen the newest mini-series yet. But naturally, I am dying to do so!
Birdienl - I definitely prefer this version. The '99 Masterpiece adaptation will always hold a "special place" because I love the cast but other than that...
ReplyDeleteI've not even attempted to read a Dickens yet but I've paged through novels and read a couple of other "classic" literature. The dialect is just so... different than today's language. The reading is indeed very "heavy." So not my scene. ;D
I've not seen "Edwin" yet but will be posting about it ASAP - likely in the next couple of weeks! Cannot wait! It is said to be "creepy," but then, I think most of Dickens could be categorized that way... in certain distinctions.
Jemimah - thanks! I loved getting to write a review of this. =)
Generally speaking, I think Dickens works are quirky. He was just so brilliant though - my dad even likes the films. After watching this one, he was like, "everything is so complex." And, that is very true - there is a reason for everything and rarely (if ever) did Dickens bring in a character that wasn't going to have a greater purpose.
I've be curious to know how you think this compared with the novel - I've heard both arguments. Some think it is way different and others think this was well adapted.
I hope you get to see it soon, and enjoy it!
Hi dear!!! I really like your blog!!! If you want take a look at my blog!! Follow each other on GFC, Bloglovin and FB??!!! I follow you back of course!!! Let me know!! Hope see you soon on my blog! kiss :D
ReplyDeletehttp://thefashionscan.blogspot.it/
http://www.facebook.com/thefashionscan
I am so watching this now!!!
ReplyDeleteFashion Scan - aw! Thanks so much for your sweet words. I really appreciate them. Stop in again. =)
ReplyDeleteOff to check out your blog. =)
Jennifer - do! It is a lovely (if not slightly) quirky mini-series. Totally Dickens.
Enjoy!
Another Great Expectations adaption! I think I've seen 2... or 3... I don't remember now.
ReplyDeleteI do love the story. I think Pip is one of Dickens' most realistic characters (although the opening scenes have always scared me - with Magwitch in the graveyard.)
Nice review. I'll have to check this one out. :)
Yes, indeed it is, Lauren. =) Gosh! Sometimes, I wish that film-makers would re-make Martin Chuzzlewit or some of the other worthy period films. Ah! Well... that is life.
ReplyDeleteI've seen two prior versions and this is the best of the lot IMO. Hmmm... you may have a point about Pip, I've never thought of his character that way. David Copperfield is probably a fairly "realistic" character - in part because his story is the closest to Dickens.
Enjoy if you see this one, Lauren!
I didn't rush out to see this movie when it first came out because I didn't really like the novel, but you're changing my mind. :-) Another added to my netflix queue!
ReplyDeleteI've not read the novel, Gwen but I know I'd have a difficult time getting through it! That is FOR sure.
ReplyDeleteThe movie is... quirky, like all of Dickens pieces but we get to see some truly great acting and some pretty costumes. I think IMO, this one will grow on me with subsequent viewings so it will be interesting to see how that pans out. =)
I'm reading this book right now, and hope to watch the movie after finishing it. new follower!
ReplyDeletejoannadell.blogspot.com
Really? That is cool. I've not been able to convince myself to read any Dickens but I love these film/miniseries adaptations. This one is by far the best of the lot. (Of Great Expectations.) I hope you enjoy, Jo.
ReplyDeleteHi, Jo! It is lovely to "meet" you. I am so glad you stopped in and introduced yourself - please stop in again... and often. =)
Off to check out your blog.