Happy May, everyone! Given that Efron's movie, New Year's Eve releases to DVD today, it only seems appropriate that I also post the review on this, his latest film. To begin this review, let us start with some perfectly legitimate questions: How many screaming, young girls do you suppose will see this movie merely because Zac Efron’s muscled physique is featured on the romantic poster in addition to just his name alone being plastered above that? After all, women love a good romance every now and then, right? For those of us who love a good drama with pretty theatrics that is set against scenic locations – plus stars a leading guy who is easy on the eyes, the answer is, yes. Fortunately for The Lucky One, it has everything listed and then some, finding its own voice in the process.
Destiny is something you sometimes have to experience to
believe… or that is what U.S. Marine Sergeant Logan Thibault (Efron) discovers.
While on his third tour of duty in Iraq, he’d have never believed the detour
his life would take once he leaves the Marine Corp possible. Following a tense night
raid in which two platoons crossed paths but cost lives,
Logan finds a well-loved photograph lying among rocks with the words “keep
safe” on the back and a blonde-haired woman. Seconds later, a bomb drops in the place Logan just moved from. Unable to find the owner of the photo, Logan carries it with him through the rest of his tour, even
as his friend claims it to be Logan’s lucky charm – the only thing still
keeping him alive… just before they are to return home, their convoy is hit…
Victor doesn’t make it out. Logan does.
Back home, Logan’s adjustment to civilian life is rocky. Every car that backfires, every video game sends Logan into
combat mode. His sister urges him to get help but instead he simply leaves, taking Victors advice, he sets out to find the woman in the
photo – to find himself. Finding the lighthouse located in Hampton Louisiana,
Logan comes face-to-face with her. She is Beth Green (Taylor Schilling), a
single mom who runs her family’s dog training farm. Raising her young
son, Beth left teaching when her Nana (Blythe Danner) had a mild stroke. Friendship blooms between the pair… but life's curveballs threaten to get in the way.
If only one
thing could be said about novelist Nicholas Sparks, it’d be that he has a
simplistic, easy-going knack for gushing romantics. Helmed as one of Spark’s
“best” (with exception to the always touted The
Notebook – honestly, what is so great about that one?), this film was
actually more than a “pretty face.” Prior to this, I’d never read any of Mr.
Sparks books, and this led me to admit that the experience was all the richer
having read the novel. Tending more towards being a visual person, I still
probably liked the on-screen story thinking it superior but it made the movie
seem all the “better” for having read the story first. I loved knowing what was
coming, what the characters were meant to be feeling and thinking of at the
time and also, their motivations.
Reflective
and moody would best be how to describe this nearly two-hour piece of
film-work. It seems to burrow itself in emotions that “feel” unusually genuine –
and it works well. A lot of key moments and scenes are nothing more than
expressions and characters observing how others react or act in situations they
are placed in. The film is admirable simply by making its own mistakes and
taking “risks” of a kind by (as usual) being contradictory to the novel. I
cannot say that I didn’t like the changes but I must concede that Sparks better
developed the relationship between Logan and Ben (Riley Thomas Stewart). The
scenes here are still fabulous but they number less. To its credit, the romance
of each moment is not just “sappy” (“you should be kissed every day…”) but also
breaking free of that, is sweetly genuine and touching. There are times when
it is downright sensual (courtesy of two love scenes) but I actually found
everything came together beautifully.
Writing about
this and thinking back on it, I’ve tried not
to be biased because I did read some reviews (note to self: badly done!) prior
to seeing it which has been something I’ve not been doing of late. Given how
“kind” mainstream critics have been to it only further intrigued me. The film
itself is wonderfully honest and complimentary to the heart of the story. No
matter what critics say about Efron, I thought he was (hello) wonderful in the
role. With Logan, he proved that he has more acting chops than just that of a
teen idol from his HSM days. His depiction of Logan was one of substance and
heart-wrenching emotions that not everyone could have pulled off; he was quiet
in nature but took Beth’s feelings seriously by being not just a friend but a
good listener. He understood her pain where everyone else did not. Similarly,
the rest of the cast does nothing to hinder the movie; I don’t think Taylor did
a bad job as Beth by any means (she played off of Efron well); she wears her
heart on her sleeve in certain instances where we do glimpse her deep sorrow
but she didn’t play heart-wrenching emotions well.
Did the
screenplay compliment the story? Yes, without question but it also did things
its own way, and I can respect that having now actually read the novel then
seen the movie come to life. (Just one example was downplaying Keith’s
character – I really valued the omission of his true nature.) There were
liberties taken but I loved how the movie started, giving us a firm idea of
Logan’s emotions later in the film and those liberties were not necessarily a
“bad” thing. It was moving in certain instances, disappointing in others but
most of all, it was really beautiful. There was more than just a sweeping
romance at stake, and as much as is fair to expect, The Lucky One rose to the occasion.
Tell me... what did you think of this one? Is the book "better" in your opinion? Are you even going to see this one? Share any thoughts below.
(What to know: this film is rated PG13 for two lengthy love scenes [shot in the muted glow of evening]. One begins in the shower and is a sensual picture of a clothed [heavy] make-out scene, legs wrapped around each other before moving to the bedroom in a slow dance of clothing removal [hands move down the others body and there is movement under the sheets]. A man drowns; there are about ten minutes worth of scenes on the battlefield with some explosions and gunfire. Startled, Logan nearly chokes his nephew. Beth often dresses immodestly and drinking alcohol is second-nature to the adults. Profanity is infrequent; a few uses of sh*t, h*ll and GD is about all there is.)
(What to know: this film is rated PG13 for two lengthy love scenes [shot in the muted glow of evening]. One begins in the shower and is a sensual picture of a clothed [heavy] make-out scene, legs wrapped around each other before moving to the bedroom in a slow dance of clothing removal [hands move down the others body and there is movement under the sheets]. A man drowns; there are about ten minutes worth of scenes on the battlefield with some explosions and gunfire. Startled, Logan nearly chokes his nephew. Beth often dresses immodestly and drinking alcohol is second-nature to the adults. Profanity is infrequent; a few uses of sh*t, h*ll and GD is about all there is.)



































I want to see this movie so bad! Mostly because I'm a sucker for sweet romances (my family doesn't like them, so they're a treat for me ;) And... because Zac Efron is adorbs. ;)
ReplyDeleteI may or may not see this movie... I am always disappointed in a romance which culminates in a night together. This looks like an interesting story, but I have trouble with swallowing Hollywood's idea of romance... =/
ReplyDeleteRachel - you and me both! I love a "good" romance. My movie shelf is kind of packed full of them, too. ;D
ReplyDeleteZac Efron is cute, isn't he!? ("Adorbs" works well! ;D) All that aside, I was actually really impressed with his acting; he actually made a good, believable leading man and I hope he continues to get some good roles that challenge him because he has talent.
AnnaKate - I hear you.
Unfortunately, Hollywood is probably not going to reform itself anytime soon - if ever. I have made the decision to watch movies accepting that they will deal with topics I don't believe in because otherwise, I wouldn't watch anything! Hollywood's idea of romance is not how it should be seen... but sadly, most people do view it as that.
gah, i saw this in my feed and my heart skipped a beat. i HAVE. to see this movie. thanks for the thorough, honest review, Rissi :D It's nice to hear from someone whose read the book, y'know? ;)
ReplyDeletexoxo,
Jessica @ Diary of a Beautiful Soul
Aw! I am glad you are looking forward to seeing this one, Jessica because it is actually really quite good. I thoroughly enjoyed it. =) (Definitely a buy-on-dvd movie.)
ReplyDeleteThe book: Normally, I don't care that I've not read the novel prior to or even after the film but I felt the experience was all the richer so I am exceedingly glad I did. It was well worth it.
Thank you for commenting - I always try to be honest so it is nice when readers feel like I have accomplished that in reviews. Thank you.
It always seems better to read the book if you are going to watch the movie. I'm telling my mom to just wait (she is saying that Papa George from Hugo is mean) and hear the rest of the story. It's much nicer knowing what it coming, being outraged at the changes (if they're bad) and in the end deciding which was better. :) Thanks for the review. Sierra
ReplyDeleteKeep Growing Beautiful♥ (Because You Are!)
Philippians 4:8
I was never one to read the novel prior to - or even after seeing the movie (if I did, it'd usually be a Christian book/film), still, I am willing to admit that I loved seeing this one that much more, Sierra. =) It perhaps is changing my thoughts. Maybe. ;-)
ReplyDeleteAbout a month ago I watched Hugo - it was really good but awfully slow.
So glad you stopped in. =)