
One of the
sweeter productions from the Brits, I cannot help but think this little gem never did reach its full potential.
The Oldknow
family name is facing ruin. This is all thanks to the beauty, Maria (Carice van
Houten) who snagged the Captain’s attention and his allowing her far too much.
Not a proper English woman, Maria’s heritage is one without fortune and as a
result some twenty years and two children later, she is still fighting to be
accepted as the wife of Captain Oldknow (Hugh Bonneville) and all that comes
with the name. Gone a great deal of the time, the Captain is often unaware of
what goes on in his household. Unable to prevent his wife’s uncontrollable
gambling habits, he is fiercely protective of his young daughter (Eliza Hope
Bennett) who was born blind but is a child not without determination. Then
there is his sulking son, Sefton (Douglas Booth). The boy is a disappointment
to his father and feeds off the misguidance of the family’s conniving butler
Caxton (Dominic West). Little do any of them know just the influence and
distress he is yet to create.
Such a tale is unraveled through the eyes of young Tolly (Alex Etel) some years later. A descendent of the
Captain’s family, Tolly’s England is embroiled in WWII and he has just got word
that his father is missing in action. Needing to find work, his mother sends
Tolly to her husband’s old family estate and his grandmother, Mrs. Oldknow
(Maggie Smith). Tolly knows little of his grandmother or her world since she
was unhappy with her son’s choice of a bride but he remembers his father
speaking fondly of the home he grew up in and Tolly is desperate to hang on to
his beloved father. Strange things begin happening and Tolly finds himself back
in time uncovering the scandals of his family’s past.
This was one
of those films that did not release in a timely manner in the states and
subsequently passed in and out of importance. I’d read reviews on it and even
really wanted to see it at the time and then never tried to obtain a copy once
it was finally made available. I happened to spot it at the rental store this
past week and seized the opportunity to finally get a look at it. The end
result is simple in that I do not regret having seen it but I also was dissatisfied
in so many of its quaint vignette plot lines that it makes it hard to really appreciate
every nuance or point the story itself is trying to make.
Penned by
the brilliant and by now well known screenplay writer Julian Fellowes, much of
this movie is true to his unique style – it is quite easy to spot his signature
approach. The script isn’t bad (Maggie Smith in particular gets in some good
zingers) but it wasn’t properly put to the screen… in my humble opinion. The
mystery keeps us intrigued as does the back-and-forth between eras but I am not
sure that alone was enough. Fellowes also directed and produced this one and I
think it was, overall lacking in the end. There wasn’t that spark it needed to
be a truly “great” or unforgettable movie that we’d want to watch over and over
again – somehow the pacing felt terribly lacking and in that, the film seemed
to drag more than it should have given the potential its plot had. Nearly all
is forgiven by the appearance of the phenomenal cast! Before Downton Abbey, Hugh and Maggie starred
in this little movie in which they have no scenes together while other cast
members include Pauline Collins and Timothy Spall, while it was fun to see
Booth in something prior to his role as Pip in the latest Great Expectations – watching a British production is fun just to
make a game of picking out which faces you’ve seen in prior mini-series.
Costuming is also pretty but more so in the past than present given it took
place in a more carefree era that was accustomed to pretty things.
There is a
message here that even today, many will relate to. I think at its heart, the
story tries to teach us that although it is painful to say good-bye that day
does have to come – for all of us, and though heartbreaking, there is healing.
Tolly’s connection to the past teaches him something about the present and that
is a priceless lesson for him. It is a lovely little production to look at. The
sprawling old family mansion that is at the center of the story in its current
state gives the illusion of a mystery and the past paints a pretty picture of
what it once was; warm tones and colorful blossoms. I liked the contrast in
seasons which was likely added to show the differential in time periods. Not an
ending we may expect of the script, flaws and all, it leaves us wishing for an
epilogue but then, it wouldn’t have the flair of the Julian Fellowes we have
come to know.
(Content
concerns: Rated PG there are minor
thematic elements such as ghostly figures present in the house and Tolly being
able to talk with them. Some immodest clothing is present with period costumes.
A fire burns down part of a house and nearly takes the lives of two children.)


































It's been ages since I saw this, but I do remember enjoying it.
ReplyDeleteWow, I have never even heard of this... Which is weird because I love Jullian Fellows, Maggie Smith, Hugh Bonville, and Douglas Booth... Just added it to the queue... ;)
ReplyDeleteI haven't even heard about this one! I need to see it =)
ReplyDeleteIt's been ages since I've seen this one as well - I remember liking it, but it was more "somber" than I expected, I think...
ReplyDeleteCharity - it is sweet and enjoyable but... there was something lacking.
ReplyDeleteTory - fans of British productions or Julian Fellowes should see this one because his style as a writer definitely shows through. I know right: Isn't that a fabulous cast!?
Enjoy!!
Natalie - yep, you should. :-) If you like Fellowes work, it is a sweet little movie.
Ruth - that is a good way to put it. This movie never seemed to reach its full potential and is rather somber. Still, I don't regret seeing it, and would probably watch it again, flaws and all. :-)
I'd never heard of this one Rissi! Thanks for recommending. :D
ReplyDeleteIt was a title that didn't get much publication here in the states, Rachel, so it isn't surprising that there are few people who heard of it. For the most part though, it is a really sweet little film.
ReplyDeleteEnjoy!!
i need to see this : how have i not heard of this before ? thanks for the review :)
ReplyDeleteI don't think you are alone, Rachel - this was one that kind of flew "under the radar." I hope you see it and enjoy it. I'd watch this one again, it just wasn't my most fave - definitely can tell Fellowes wrote the script having seeing his other handiwork.
ReplyDeleteThank you so much for stopping in - I hope you do again sometime. It was lovely to "meet" you. :-)
I really like this one, but completely agree that when I first watched it there was just a tiny something missing - I recon it's one that grows on you when you know what to expect :)
ReplyDeleteI did too, Sarah BUT yes, it did lack... something. I suspect you are right that it is one that would grow on the viewer and indeed, I would definitely watch it again because all around, it was just darn sweet!
ReplyDelete