Said to be
extensively researched and the first production to tell the story from Wallis’
perspective, I’d eyed this for a few years on Amazon, watching for price
fluctuations and such. Finally was my curiosity overcome, especially when
I realized its connection to Colin Firth's The King’s Speech who was the brother of Edward and the man who
succeeded him to the throne. After that, it seemed an appropriate time to
finally see this.
Not their
idea of a proper successor to the throne, the Royal family’s heir is a playboy. Currently on a tour of America, Prince Edward (Stephen
Campbell Moore) isn’t exactly a shinning example of impeccable manners to his
family. He is being hosted for dinner by a small circle of middle-class
Americans whom he met on one occasion. Among them are the Simpsons, Ernest
(David Westhead) and his wife, Wallis (Joely Richardson). Before long, the
little group is seen together frequently and the Simpsons are invited to join
Edward in England. It is Wallis however, who captures his fancy, and
she is encouraged to keep him
amused. For her part, Wallis merely keeps company with the Prince and is a part
of his traveling entourage, but more soon follows the innocent banter.
With the death of his father, Edward becomes king and the Prime Minister begins
making demands on parliament that the King’s relationship with the American
divorcee go no further than that of a mistress.
Opposition befalls
them from the British realm. Determined to beat his mother, personal assistant,
Perry (Simon Hepworth) and the entire British government at its own game,
Edward plans on making Wallis his wife pending the completion of a divorce.
Even with the timid support of Winston Churchill (David Calder) and his
brother, Bertie (Bill Champion), Edward faces a great emotional battle, one
that will come with sacrifice.
Contrary to
initial inklings, I have found period dramas set in later eras just as engaging
as any Austen films. Such dramas as Downton
Abbey have made a splash, earning themselves a well-deserved place among
the best British dramas. Wallis and
Edward is one of those. Some of its themes surprised me, others did not but
this series is unique enough to considering seeing. This story is an
interesting one since it has a variety of different ways it could be approached.
Many believe Wallis was the temptress, deciding to ruin her own marriage and in
effect ruin a king. Divided opinion is definitely the factor of these
historical events. Usually when watching a film about monarchs, it is generally
not romanticized. Most stories are
“realistic” in that they chose to depict many couples as having arranged
marriages or relationships that are not loving but necessary. When I come across
historical stories that depicts the couple in love, the on-screen romanticism
is a breath of fresh air. This particular story has had many variations and
more than one studio has undertaken it (a feature film was just released).
Being the first one I saw immortalized on film, I really loved this
interpretation – which is why it may always be my favorite. In fact, this
adaptation wants to make a statement and prove Wallis wanted to leave Edward in
favor of seeing him fulfill his duty in turn painting Edward as “desperate” for
her love. If there are any real failings, it can be hard to connect or
sympathize with any of the characters. There comes a period of time that we do
feel something for Wallis’ position but quickly wonder if she is worthy of any
understanding as the rumors of her past surface. Plus she actively participated
in an affair, just as he pursued her. Edward is the most difficult because of
his demeanor; his controlling personality is irritating.
At its best,
there was a tender connection between the lovers and it was a sweet romance
with realistic hardship meting beautiful results. Costuming is, as always
gorgeous as are the locales. Most the film takes place in England so much of
the scenery is wide landscapes at Windsor. I do have some issue with the cast.
It may be interesting to note that there is quite an age gap between Richardson
and Moore, whether that is historical or merely on the part of casting
directors is never clear, and actually never is a story thread. Stephan gave a
really emotional performance. Apart from a couple smaller roles, I’d never seen
him in a leading role but he really did a magnificent job while being an asset
to the production. It was Joely that I took issue with. Normally she is a
talented addition to any cast but I was constantly noticing her lack of decorum
for this era, even in the smallest things; posture, dialogue and motivations –
that was before constantly reminding myself that was all a part of her
character. She was meant to be a direct contrast to British society, to create
a stir. Wallis needed to stand out from her peers; she was supposed to be the
type of person the Queen would never receive. Though we’re supposed to believe
that Edward is a playboy, that is never well written nor does the romance initially
engross us. During their first meeting, we do not get the idea that these two
will become more than acquaintances. Pegged as the greatest love story ever
told, or the one “love affair that changed history,” I cannot say that is
exactly how I see this, but it is an interesting story. Whether you’re a
history buff or looking for some new costume drama bliss, you can do a lot
worse than Acorn Media’s Wallis and
Edward.
(Content:
There is talk of extra-marital affairs and one love-making scene; there is caressing
but they remain clothed and do so ‘til the camera cuts away, but scenes show
them rolling around in the sheets. Implications suggest Wallis worked in
brothels. She was previously divorced. As previously stated, the inference of
adulterous affairs are there – not one but two are uncovered. As was the custom
in those days, smoking and social drinking is prevalent to many scenes.
Profanity is not too much trouble but there are a few. In the heat of the
moment one couple slap one another across the face. One man threatens suicide.)



































I've yet to see this one, but I do love a good period drama, so I'll have to soon =)
ReplyDeleteBoth of them as people were highly self centered and immature. Neither historically is that likable. Not a bad film though.
ReplyDeleteNatalie - I debated a long time before seeing this one also but I thought it was well worth it. It is especially interesting when you see all the other productions centering on these events.
ReplyDeleteCharity - I never take historical movies too seriously unless I know the "real facts" but for a night's entertainment, this one was really good. It may not be accurate but it is probably my most favorite version.
Mine is WE. Don't know why but I love that film.
DeleteThat one is on my "to-see" list. :-)
ReplyDelete